In the heart of Montreal’s Parc-Extension neighborhood, a sudden change in a planned bike path has stirred concern and frustration among local residents and their representatives. Park-Ex News recently learned from City Councilor Mary Deros that the city has altered the route of a long-discussed bike path without prior notice or public consultation, sparking questions about the transparency of the city’s decision-making process.
Initially, the bike path was to be constructed along de l’Épée Avenue, but without informing residents, the city rerouted the path to Querbes Avenue, stretching from Beaumont Avenue to Ogilvy Avenue. This unexpected change has left many in the community feeling blindsided and disadvantaged, as they were not given the opportunity to voice their opinions or concerns before the decision was made.
The Councilor expressed dissatisfaction with how the situation was handled, emphasizing that the lack of communication has eroded trust between the city administration and the community. The sudden change is seen as a top-down approach that fails to consider the input and needs of those directly affected.
Beyond the issue of communication, there are also concerns about the practicality of the new bike path. The Councilor highlighted the absence of a critical link between Outremont and Parc-Extension, which has long been a priority for local cyclists and community leaders. Without this connection, the newly planned bike path may not achieve its full potential, leaving it isolated and potentially underused.
The Councilor has urged the city to reconsider its approach, suggesting that a more integrated and connected cycling infrastructure would better serve the needs of both neighborhoods. This situation underscores the importance of thoughtful and inclusive planning, where residents are actively involved in decisions that impact their daily lives.
As the debate continues, the future of the bike path on Querbes Avenue remains uncertain. Local leaders and residents alike are calling for greater transparency and accountability from the city, along with a renewed focus on community engagement in the urban planning process. The outcome of this controversy will likely shape the direction of future infrastructure projects in Parc-Extension and beyond, as the community strives for a more connected and inclusive approach to development.
